Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

User avatar
eufo
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 243
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 7:17 pm

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by eufo »

ochotona wrote: I think you'd be doing your friend a favor if you talked him into selling half of his EM allocation, and buying gold. It's an OK portfolio, if he's younger. If he's over 50, he's going to have trouble when the 60% stocks and REIT lose 1/2 or more of their value in the next bear market.
Indeed I would, but I never offer advice unless I'm asked. When he originally asked I wasn't comfortable with gold like I am now. I've mentioned that I hold gold, but unless he asks I won't interfere. Like I said, he's very happy with it.
Libertarian666 wrote: I was very fortunate in that my first attempt to outsmart the market led to an almost instant margin call, which convinced me to avoid margin afterwards.
I'm sure you didn't feel fortunate in that moment, but at least you learned early instead of late. Can you imagine amassing a fortune and then getting margin called out of it? A disaster sure to befall some unlucky fool.
Dieter wrote: Sounds like a 60/40 Swenson-ish.

http://www.npr.org/2015/10/17/436993646 ... portfolios
That is rather close. I know for sure there was no talk of Developed International, but other than that, extremely close. It still ends up being like a 60/40, though REITs can be a bit feisty when compared with normal equities.
Don't agree with me too strongly or I'm going to change my mind
PP67
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 188
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:19 am

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by PP67 »

A picture is worth a thousand words... A variable chart is worth a thousand pictures...I think a great place to suggest to "seekers" is to send them to Tyler's excellent portfoliocharts.com site and let them play with the various portfolios or plug in what they are now doing and see how the compare. They might find out on their own that perhaps a little gold dust is just the secret ingredient they have been looking for.

https://portfoliocharts.com/
Jack Jones
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 526
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 3:12 pm

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by Jack Jones »

eufo wrote:Indeed I would, but I never offer advice unless I'm asked.
Very wise!
modeljc
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 271
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:52 am

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by modeljc »

PP67 wrote:A picture is worth a thousand words... A variable chart is worth a thousand pictures...I think a great place to suggest to "seekers" is to send them to Tyler's excellent portfoliocharts.com site and let them play with the various portfolios or plug in what they are now doing and see how the compare. They might find out on their own that perhaps a little gold dust is just the secret ingredient they have been looking for.

https://portfoliocharts.com/
Try:

15% Total Stock Market
15% Mid cap Value
25% Small cap Value
20% Long term Treasuries
25% Gold

Modeljc Butterfly? 7.7% REAL RETURNS

That might be why NO BELIEVES IN THE PERMANENT PORTFOLIO?

PP RETURNS ARE SMALL AND BORING AND WE ALL HOPE FOR MORE
User avatar
I Shrugged
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:35 pm

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by I Shrugged »

I don't know if HB's book is too simple for some analytical types. I think maybe you need to have battle scars to appreciate it fully.

Sophie I would recommend Berstein's Four Pillars book. Assuming he is smart and analytical. It really showed me the error of my ways as far as using active funds, let alone stock picking.
User avatar
Hal
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1352
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 1:50 am

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by Hal »

So are the principles espoused by Benjamin Graham still valid today, or should you just say "I don't know what is going to happen" and go for the PP?

http://www.conscious-investor.com/books ... vestor.pdf
stuper1
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1365
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:18 pm

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by stuper1 »

modeljc wrote: Try:

15% Total Stock Market
15% Mid cap Value
25% Small cap Value
20% Long term Treasuries
25% Gold

Modeljc Butterfly? 7.7% REAL RETURNS

That might be why NO BELIEVES IN THE PERMANENT PORTFOLIO?

PP RETURNS ARE SMALL AND BORING AND WE ALL HOPE FOR MORE
Add in 10% to 15% cash, by removing say 5% SCV and 5% to 10% gold, and rebalance annually, and I'd say that would be a lot better portfolio than what most people have.
User avatar
Cortopassi
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by Cortopassi »

I believe!

Gold could drop like a stone tomorrow, but the bond and gold bears continue to be wrong, and right. You just never know. TLT is coming back, and silver/gold are leading the pack.

Image
farjean2
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 284
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 12:51 am

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by farjean2 »

Cortopassi wrote:I believe!

Gold could drop like a stone tomorrow, but the bond and gold bears continue to be wrong, and right. You just never know. TLT is coming back, and silver/gold are leading the pack.
Judging from about 8 years in the PP, you can almost always count on gold and long bonds to lead the pack when there is bad news on the horizon. You just have to hope the bad news doesn't fully materialize.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14289
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by dualstow »

Cortopassi wrote:I believe!

Gold could drop like a stone tomorrow, but the bond and gold bears continue to be wrong, and right. You just never know. TLT is coming back, and silver/gold are leading the pack.

https://i.imgur.com/UyHO6BL.png
Hey, didn't you just finish telling me not to jinx it? ???
O0
🍍
User avatar
eufo
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 243
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 7:17 pm

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by eufo »

It's always a little bittersweet when gold and bonds are strengthening. I'm currently overweight both in my long and slow transition from PP to semi-GB. Days like today feel pretty good in my brokerage account, but at what cost? I really hope peace prevails.
Don't agree with me too strongly or I'm going to change my mind
User avatar
Cortopassi
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by Cortopassi »

dualstow wrote:
Cortopassi wrote:I believe!

Gold could drop like a stone tomorrow, but the bond and gold bears continue to be wrong, and right. You just never know. TLT is coming back, and silver/gold are leading the pack.

https://i.imgur.com/UyHO6BL.png
Hey, didn't you just finish telling me not to jinx it? ???
O0
I prefaced with "Gold could drop like a stone tomorrow..." ;D
User avatar
frugal
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 947
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:49 pm

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by frugal »

Hi pp friends.

Is there any low volatility and higher returns portfolio?

I believe not, so this is the best.

Am I right?

Happy easter!
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by mathjak107 »

depends what you consider a higher return and acceptable volatility .

a cd is lower volatility and the return for that volatility may be the best to you if that is an acceptable return that meets your goals ..

to me the gb is an acceptable return so i could say the same thing about the gb . for the return and volatility it is the best . best is a relative term .

to me the pp return vs volatility is not as an acceptable return as the gb.

so we all have our own ideas as what is best for the volatility , returns and our investment goals . .
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14289
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by dualstow »

Happy Easter, Frugal,
🍍
Jack Jones
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 526
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 3:12 pm

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by Jack Jones »

Frugal, I'm glad you're still out there. You keep doing you, man.
modeljc
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 271
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:52 am

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by modeljc »

eufo wrote:It's always a little bittersweet when gold and bonds are strengthening. I'm currently overweight both in my long and slow transition from PP to semi-GB. Days like today feel pretty good in my brokerage account, but at what cost? I really hope peace prevails.
Would be interested in what GB per cent allocations you will be heading for? What will your final GB look like? Seems to me it would be hard to head to a 20% allocation in small cap value. It has had a big run. What is your plan for a final allocation and when do you enter things you don't own? Will you GB hold any Cash ECT?
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by mathjak107 »

i toned it down to an extended market fund vxf after such a run up in small cap .
User avatar
eufo
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 243
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 7:17 pm

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by eufo »

modeljc wrote:
eufo wrote:It's always a little bittersweet when gold and bonds are strengthening. I'm currently overweight both in my long and slow transition from PP to semi-GB. Days like today feel pretty good in my brokerage account, but at what cost? I really hope peace prevails.
Would be interested in what GB per cent allocations you will be heading for? What will your final GB look like? Seems to me it would be hard to head to a 20% allocation in small cap value. It has had a big run. What is your plan for a final allocation and when do you enter things you don't own? Will you GB hold any Cash ECT?
I said semi-GB, but that's not really a fair assessment of where I'm going. When I began my transition a few months ago, I was headed towards:

20% LCB
20% SCV
20% LTT
20% Gold
20% REIT

This was my semi-GB, swapping into REIT from STT.

Then I changed to:

20% LCV
20% MCV
20% SCV
20% LTT
20% Gold

Feeling thoroughly disappointed with ETF options for the Value equities, I decided to head toward using Blends instead.

My current monstrosity of a portfolio looks like this:

5% TSM
4% LCB
5% LCV
2% MCB
5% MCV
2% SCB
5% SCV
21% LTT
14% STT
22% Gold
4% REIT
11% Cash

Oddly enough, it's not a terrible portfolio... just looks ugly to my OCD. Plug it into Tyler's site and you'll see it's pretty smooth. 5.3% Real CAGR. Deepest Drawdown 11%, 2 years. Might be better than what I'm aiming for... *shrugs*
Don't agree with me too strongly or I'm going to change my mind
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14289
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by dualstow »

Ha, that really is a monstrosity.
🍍
User avatar
Dieter
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 656
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 10:51 am

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by Dieter »

Did you consider GB, but split SCV into SCV / ISB?

Or for more tilt, have stock allocation be 1/3 each of TSM, SCV, ISB.

Bonds 1/3 each to LTT, ITT, Cash/STT

But if it works for ya.....
User avatar
frugal
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 947
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:49 pm

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by frugal »

mathjak107 wrote:depends what you consider a higher return and acceptable volatility .

a cd is lower volatility and the return for that volatility may be the best to you if that is an acceptable return that meets your goals ..

to me the gb is an acceptable return so i could say the same thing about the gb . for the return and volatility it is the best . best is a relative term .

to me the pp return vs volatility is not as an acceptable return as the gb.

so we all have our own ideas as what is best for the volatility , returns and our investment goals . .

hello

how are you?

GB is gold bullion?

What is your asset allocation now?

All the best.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14289
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by dualstow »

Since mathjak often responds to questions that were asked of others, I'll return the favor.

GB = Golden Butterfly
https://portfoliocharts.com/portfolio/golden-butterfly/
🍍
User avatar
frugal
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 947
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:49 pm

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by frugal »

dualstow wrote:Since mathjak often responds to questions that were asked of others, I'll return the favor.

GB = Golden Butterfly
https://portfoliocharts.com/portfolio/golden-butterfly/
hi

I think this one is from Tony Robbins.

GB is also very good.

A lot of people is changing from PP to GB?

What are the disadvantages?

Thank you so much.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 14289
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: synagogue of Satan
Contact:

Re: Nobody believes in the Permanent Portfolio

Post by dualstow »

Well, only if Tony Robbins goes by "Tyler" on this forum.
Anyway, I think it's good too. Not *that* different from the pp.
🍍
Locked