Mathjak's Market Calls

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

User avatar
lazyboy
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 299
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:04 pm

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by lazyboy » Sat Nov 07, 2015 12:53 am

"as far as annuty's i think immediate annuity's may be playing a part in many of our retirements going forward . if not so much for us but if we have a spouse ,especially a wife who is not in to investing  pensionizing a piece of your non discretionary spending in to a check n the mail box can help her  a lot ."

When I retired in 2007 I bought an immediate annuity through Vanguard with about half my retirement savings. On reflection, I'm OK with having done that- the annual payout was high at that time -over 8% a year for a lifetime. It created an immediate pension. Since than, payouts are less. Of course the down side is the money's locked up and can't be withdrawn for emergencies or other investments. That's why they recommend using no more than 50% of retirement assets to buy one.
My question MJ: Would you be more in stocks as a % of remaining investment if you bought an immediate annuity?  Or would your 40-60% in stocks stay the same ? 
Inside of me there are two dogs. One is mean and evil and the other is good and they fight each other all the time. When asked which one wins I answer, the one I feed the most.�

Sitting Bull
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by mathjak107 » Sat Nov 07, 2015 3:18 am

i would simply replace some of the bond portion with the spia  and the allocation would still stay the same .

the more conservative the portfolio the bigger the difference an spia can make .  i would not use an inflation adjusted spia . that is what your own equity's would be for , the cost of an inflation adjusted spia is just to high .

one other thing you may want to compare is the cost of a joint spia to a single  spia with a separate life insurance policy .


that combo has done the best in 70% of the time frames looked at .  unlike the taxable spia the insurance is tax free to a spouse  .

in fact the best value has turned out to be not buying term insurance  and trying to invest the difference when you are younger but permanent life insurance and your own investing .

while 100% of the time term and investing gave you a bigger balance  at retirement age the tide shifts right after that point . no one really looked beyond that point before pfau's white paper in great detail .they just accepted what was believed up to retirement age . . .

an integrated strategy using an spia and permanent insurance when coupled with your own investing gave you a higher income 100% of  the time and a bigger balance for heirs 70% of the time .

you have the spia which can throw off much higher income early on then bonds and cash , you have your own investing for inflation adjusting and growth and permanent life insurance for a spouse that is never taxed .

new research by kitces and dr pfau today are opening up doors to strategy's  that no sane investor would have ever considered as the better choice .

but cheaper simpler  single premium immediate annuity's changed all that since they are like buying a cd . if you like the payout  that is your deal . no other fees or expenses . vanguard seems to have the cheapest ones  , even a bit cheaper than immediateannuity.com


the older you are and the higher rates go the  better the spia deals get .

i would start to ladder them in my 70's if i did it .


do not consider variable annuity's . they are to expensive and to complex to even figure out .
Last edited by mathjak107 on Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
lazyboy
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 299
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:04 pm

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by lazyboy » Sun Nov 08, 2015 1:08 am

Thanks Mj. Very good information on spia options and also answered my question about about investment balance.
Inside of me there are two dogs. One is mean and evil and the other is good and they fight each other all the time. When asked which one wins I answer, the one I feed the most.�

Sitting Bull
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by mathjak107 » Sun Nov 08, 2015 4:09 am

You are welcome.

There are lots of academic study's now on using integrated stratagy's with spia's ,life insurance and your own investing.

You can google the work of dr wade pfau , michael kitces . Moshe milevsky, blanchette  and william bernstein for a good education on this stuff.
User avatar
lazyboy
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 299
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:04 pm

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by lazyboy » Wed Nov 11, 2015 12:56 am

Thanks, Mj, good information on strategies. I also found this bogleheads discussion link about spia and balancing a portfolio:
https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=99684
It seems what strategy you take depends on the consideration of what risk level you are willing to have to meet your goals.
Inside of me there are two dogs. One is mean and evil and the other is good and they fight each other all the time. When asked which one wins I answer, the one I feed the most.�

Sitting Bull
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by mathjak107 » Wed Nov 11, 2015 4:58 am

That is all it is about. Matching your pucker factor to realistic goals. 
As most find out looking at pretty charts and driving looking in the rear view mirror rarely gives you the results it shows previously.
Your returns and growth are all going to be unique to only you and your time frame.

The fact the pp had a good run when you had little money in it or the fact the stock markets had a great 17 year run when i had little money invested is a moot point.

What hits the hardest is what happens when you have maximum dollars accumulated.

In my case had i missed the last 5 years in equity's it would have had a huge effect on my retirement budget.  Like i said earlier , i couldn't care less that returns were weak from 2000 on . The proportion of money invested in 2000 was way way less.

So everything is about what happens to your biggest pile of dollars at any point in time.

There is likely not going to be one strategy or allocation that works all the time and forever .

It is up to you to monitor your own growth and find your own measuring stick to determine if you are on track or not.

Even small ups and downs can have pronounced effects depending on dollars accumulated.

The difference between the pp being down 2.50% and my model being up 2% is 120,000.00 dollars. That is more than most americans even have saved.
So little differences in how you allocate can produce big differences up and down.

Since 2000 volatility has become far greater and swings in allocations have been getting wider for the same allocation..

Perhaps future investing will involve insurance products designed to protect volatility from to much volatility. You can see on some down days even the pp swings more than 1% . That is like a 350 point drop in a  50/50 mix so the pp isn't really isolated either.
Going forward is going to have some pretty tough headwinds no matter what we do.

No matter what the plan you always need a plan B .
My plan B is my allocation allows me quite a few years in cash and bonds to wait out any down turns. The bonds are way less interest rate sensitive than long term bonds so if i have  to sell them during rising rates the losses will be slight.

I would hate to have to sell bonds that were as volatile as stocks if i needed to refill cash.



I also have taking social security as part of plan B . By filing it drops withdrawals way down..

Your plan B will vary.
Last edited by mathjak107 on Wed Nov 11, 2015 6:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by ochotona » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:14 am

Another "Cash is King" morning!
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by mathjak107 » Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:48 am

it will be like this until the rate increase .
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by mathjak107 » Sat Nov 14, 2015 3:38 am

for the week  no changes to the portfolio's but i did add exxon back as my speculation stock  . i owned it last month and sold it at a 15% profit  10 days  later .  so trying again since it is back in to the high 70';s again .  i was going to take a speculative short term shot with gld but with exxon coming down i prefer exxon to gld .

all fidelity  models still positive  fractionally  ,

for comparison pp is down 3% assuming at least 1% on cash .

tlt down 3%
gld down 9%
vti down 1%
cash +1%


fidelity insight growth model up  .25%- 90% stock allocation

growth and income model  up .01  69/31  stocks/bonds

income and capital preservation  model  up .03  26/ 74%  stocks/bonds

the speculative select model for ghost , since he expressed interest  is down 2.90%

so far all  portfolio models including the pp have fallen below my reference for the year , which is if i did nothing that year  but buy a cd is the trouble of investing worth it  .

so far the cd wins but i think the models will all end positive in december  beating the cd but not by much .

there was a 120k difference between the models and the pp  last week based on the amounts i would have had invested , this week  there is a  90k  difference .

i will post the dollars difference each week as that is what counts at the end of the day .

anyone feel like tracking the IVY  YTD ?  that would give us the pp , conventional investing models of all volatility levels  and  risk mgmt models  in real time .
Last edited by mathjak107 on Sat Nov 14, 2015 9:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by mathjak107 » Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:09 am

nice  jump in exxon yesterday .  a another couple of days like  that and it will be profit taking time in it again .  eventually it will go on to be higher after i sell but i really don't care with these quick speculations .

if i can get another 3% on top of yesterdays gain  trading in and out the last 5 weeks resulted in a 20% profit .
Reub
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3158
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:44 pm

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by Reub » Tue Nov 17, 2015 3:35 pm

Exxon down 1.16% today. You forgot to post it.
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by mathjak107 » Tue Nov 17, 2015 3:37 pm

once a week i will. It was up 3.50% yesterday.

Gld was down 1.32% today and wasn't up 3.50% yesterday so i am glad i did not go with it.
Last edited by mathjak107 on Tue Nov 17, 2015 3:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by mathjak107 » Sat Nov 21, 2015 12:26 pm

weekly update  . no changes

fidelity insight growth model up 3.50% YTD

growth and income model  up 2.50% YTD

capital preservation and income  model up 1% YTD

exxon i bought last weel flat .

PP  is still down - minus 2%  YTD

difference  between  50/50  portfolio  and PP is  110K  . just  a little less then the 120k  we had as a max difference in balance  since i have been posting this .
Last edited by mathjak107 on Sat Nov 21, 2015 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by mathjak107 » Tue Nov 24, 2015 8:58 am

xom sold today .  another 2-1/2% profit on top of the 16% .  i will likely re-buy when it falls back in to the 70's again . .

a few analysts rated xom under perform so i will see if that drives it lower .
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by mathjak107 » Tue Nov 24, 2015 9:28 am

i didn't lose anything i sold it this morning at a profit . i  went up a bit since i sold this morning  but that is okay . i have never caught the top in anything in ny given day nor the bottom . it may even go higher tomorrow . but when you do things by the seat of your pants that is how it goes .

but the profits are usually good regardless and it is only fun money
Last edited by mathjak107 on Tue Nov 24, 2015 9:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by mathjak107 » Tue Nov 24, 2015 9:49 am

well yes , if i didn't make it , i lost it , so in wall street thinking you are correct .

but my piggy bank says we are still another 2-1/2 % higher than had we not bought it barely a week ago . .
User avatar
Tom
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:38 pm

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by Tom » Mon May 09, 2016 1:40 pm

Time for a mathjak update.  What's the YTD?
User avatar
Tom
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:38 pm

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by Tom » Mon Jun 13, 2016 3:41 pm

With the PP up above 10% YTD this year, I'm curious to know where you're at mathjak to see if your strategy is still up ahead or if this year balances out PP's lackluster performance last year.
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4392
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by Xan » Mon Jun 13, 2016 3:51 pm

Tom wrote:With the PP up above 10% YTD this year, I'm curious to know where you're at mathjak to see if your strategy is still up ahead or if this year balances out PP's lackluster performance last year.
Mathjak has long since been banned.
barrett
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1982
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 2:54 pm

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by barrett » Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:24 am

Xan wrote:
Tom wrote:With the PP up above 10% YTD this year, I'm curious to know where you're at mathjak to see if your strategy is still up ahead or if this year balances out PP's lackluster performance last year.
Mathjak has long since been banned.
I don't think that is correct. My understanding is that he left voluntarily because we are a bunch of Kool-Aid drinkers.
User avatar
craigr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2540
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:26 pm

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by craigr » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:28 pm

Mathjak was not banned that I'm aware of and I just checked his account and it is not banned.

Very few people have ever been banned from this forum. You really need to go above and beyond to get banned, or be an outright spammer.
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4392
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by Xan » Wed Jun 15, 2016 10:45 am

I stand corrected!
User avatar
Tom
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:38 pm

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by Tom » Wed Jun 15, 2016 11:29 am

barrett wrote:
Xan wrote:
Tom wrote:With the PP up above 10% YTD this year, I'm curious to know where you're at mathjak to see if your strategy is still up ahead or if this year balances out PP's lackluster performance last year.
Mathjak has long since been banned.
I don't think that is correct. My understanding is that he left voluntarily because we are a bunch of Kool-Aid drinkers.

The Kool-Aid is tasting pretty good right about now.
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4392
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by Xan » Wed Jun 15, 2016 12:31 pm

Tom wrote:The Kool-Aid is tasting pretty good right about now.
Oh yeah!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n69H0JwsGI&t=0m11s
User avatar
vnatale
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 9422
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: Mathjak's Market Calls

Post by vnatale » Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:49 pm

mathjak107 wrote:
Mon Oct 05, 2015 1:07 pm
well whatever works .  i never go in our out . we alter allocations a little or swap fund types but trying to bet the ranch on in or out of equity's is a game i have not played since fabians can't lose  moving average newsletter .

that was until we lost  ha ha ha
I was a dedicated Dick Fabian Telephone Switch Newsletter follower for at least 3 years from 1987 to 1990. Did the 100% switch EVERY time it was called for. Then changed to someone else's newsletter from then until sometime in the late 90s (during which I again strictly followed the 100% all in either equities or cash). Then I stopped completely following anyone's newsletter switches.

Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
Post Reply