PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
Moderator: Global Moderator
PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
I started investing in the PP in mid-2011. My gains are now equal to those I saw in August, 2012. In other words, I haven't made any money in the PP in three years.
The caveat is that I've been regularly and aggressively contributing to the PP. So my early gains in 2011/2012 were small as a percent of my current total portfolio value. Losses in 2015 are applied to a much higher portfolio value. Hopefully that makes sense.
Overall, not super happy with this portfolio. I might try to move out of it by continually rebalancing into stocks but never rebalancing out of stocks until my allocation is more boglehead like.
The caveat is that I've been regularly and aggressively contributing to the PP. So my early gains in 2011/2012 were small as a percent of my current total portfolio value. Losses in 2015 are applied to a much higher portfolio value. Hopefully that makes sense.
Overall, not super happy with this portfolio. I might try to move out of it by continually rebalancing into stocks but never rebalancing out of stocks until my allocation is more boglehead like.
Last edited by dragoncar on Wed Aug 26, 2015 2:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
I appreciate that you are patient and not immediately moving your money around. That's a good attitude.
Just be warned that if the reason you want to switch is that three down years bothers you, Bogleheads portfolios can do that for a decade or more. If that's your pressure point, be sure you know what you're getting into and don't be tempted by recency bias.
Just be warned that if the reason you want to switch is that three down years bothers you, Bogleheads portfolios can do that for a decade or more. If that's your pressure point, be sure you know what you're getting into and don't be tempted by recency bias.
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
I know that objectively the PP has had a lower Sharpe ratio than, say, 75/25, but subjectively it feels like I'm not getting returns to justify the risks. For me, it seems that volatility "saturates" -- as long as I'm losing thousands in a day, it doesn't matter much to me exactly how many thousands they are -- I have the same level of anxiety. If I'm going to be anxious anyways, might as well go with something that I expect to give higher returns in the long run.Tyler wrote: I appreciate that you are patient and not immediately moving your money around. That's a good attitude.
Just be warned that if the reason you want to switch is that three down years bothers you, Bogleheads portfolios can do that for a decade or more. If that's your pressure point, be sure you know what you're getting into and don't be tempted by recency bias.
I haven't made up my mind, but the "three year negative returns" rule has been tossed around as a time take a critical look at the portfolio. I know my particular DCA path is different (worse) from a lump-sum B&H PP starting at the same time, but I've been putting this off until the three year mark.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
Bingo! Welcome to what I have been feeling all along...too bad I get berated for it. Hopefully you have more success than me.
This is how the last week has played out:
Stocks plunge, gold and treasuries are flat.
Stocks plunge again, gold and treasuries decline.
Stocks rally, gold and treasuries get demolished.
See the pattern? I know...its only a week, blah, blah, blah. Same crap, different day. Been that way since 2011.
The only time the PP will shine is if we encounter SIGNIFICANT inflation and GOLD responds (certainly questionable). Other than that, you are underweight equities and overweight fixed income at historically low yields and it shows. I would be down again today with a 600 point rally if I didn't buy equity on Monday.
This is how the last week has played out:
Stocks plunge, gold and treasuries are flat.
Stocks plunge again, gold and treasuries decline.
Stocks rally, gold and treasuries get demolished.
See the pattern? I know...its only a week, blah, blah, blah. Same crap, different day. Been that way since 2011.
The only time the PP will shine is if we encounter SIGNIFICANT inflation and GOLD responds (certainly questionable). Other than that, you are underweight equities and overweight fixed income at historically low yields and it shows. I would be down again today with a 600 point rally if I didn't buy equity on Monday.
Last edited by buddtholomew on Wed Aug 26, 2015 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
- Pointedstick
- Executive Member
- Posts: 8866
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
Budd, I berate you for complaining about something that you want to change, and have the power to change, but choose not to change for reasons that still nobody understands. For what it's worth, my PP has had similarly lousy performance over the same time period and I feel similar things. The three-year-no-gains line is here. My current line of thinking is to move into a more Desert-like allocation (overweight stocks and underweight gold) during the next stock crash.
That said, this has been a rough year for everyone so far. We may be in one of those periods where everything does poorly or treads water. Even though I haven't made any gains, it's comforting not to be worrying about when the bottom of the market is going to drop out and all hell breaks loose. It feels like we're nearing that point.
That said, this has been a rough year for everyone so far. We may be in one of those periods where everything does poorly or treads water. Even though I haven't made any gains, it's comforting not to be worrying about when the bottom of the market is going to drop out and all hell breaks loose. It feels like we're nearing that point.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
It's normal to dislike volatility but also to want higher returns. Just be sure you're looking at the right numbers and not simply assuming that volatility is always rewarded with higher compound returns. It's a common misconception. Copying one of my comments from another thread because it's relevant here:
Everyone should reevaluate their plan periodically. That's a very healthy thing to do. Just make sure you're being realistic about any direct comparisons.As an example, the average real return of the PP since 1972 is about 1% less per year than a 60-40 portfolio. But the compound real return that you'd actually experience in real-life dollars is virtually identical (within the range of fund expense ratio differences). The 40% less volatility in the PP makes up the difference mathematically. People like to say "higher risk, higher reward" but that isn't always the case.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
The problem is "everything is not doing poorly", only the PP. You gave up returns from 2011-2015 invested in this allocation while telling everyone how great it was. Now that you realize in 3 years you have no gains, you choose to switch to another portfolio. I'll let dragoncar speak his mind and won't hijack this thread.Pointedstick wrote: Budd, I berate you for complaining about something that you want to change, and have the power to change, but choose not to change for reasons that still nobody understands. For what it's worth, my PP has had similarly lousy performance over the same time period and I feel similar things. The three-year-no-gains line is here. My current line of thinking is to move into a more Desert-like allocation (overweight stocks and underweight gold) during the next stock crash.
That said, this has been a rough year for everyone so far. We may be in one of those periods where everything does poorly or treads water. Even though I haven't made any gains, it's comforting not to be worrying about when the bottom of the market is going to drop out and all hell breaks loose. It feels like we're nearing that point.
Last edited by buddtholomew on Wed Aug 26, 2015 4:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
- Pointedstick
- Executive Member
- Posts: 8866
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
Everything has been doing poorly this year; that's what I was referring to. Last year the PP did great. But you're right, and hindsight's a bitch. However, I refuse to dwell on a past I can't change. The portfolio seemed like a great idea and I certainly haven't lost anything--just given up hypothetical gains, which is both different and constant; you're always giving up gains you didn't know at the time you could receive if you had done something different. What's changed is that I've realized is that I can tolerate more volatility than I thought I could and I like stocks more than I thought I did. For many years, I've kept separate stock-heavy portfolios in other accounts that I couldn't make into a PP and the volatility in them hasn't really upset me. I think investing in assets you like and minimizing assets you don't is more important than we've all thought, because the assets you hate are the ones that make you question your plan at the worst possible time, and the ones you love are the ones whose wild rides you're more easily able to tolerate.buddtholomew wrote: The problem is "everything is not doing poorly", only the PP. You gave up returns from 2011-2015 invested in this allocation while telling everyone how great it was. Now that you realize in 3 years you have no gains, you choose to switch to another portfolio. I'll let dragoncar speak his mind and won't hijack this thread.
What I plan to move into is still pretty PP-like, with more gold than average and a lot of bonds, and, in terms of backtests, not much more volatility at all. And I plan to wait for a while to implement it. I'm not selling right now.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
- mathjak107
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4456
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
- Location: bayside queens ny
- Contact:
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
there is never a perfect plan .
when i abandoned the pp idea for my own model within days equty's crapped the bed .
then of course you say gee maybe the permanent portfolio is not such a bad thing .
then you see how easily stocks can roar back and watch the pp get clobbered and i go good choice .
there is never a time what you own will be the answer .
if low volatility is your goal then realize low volatility is no guarantee of performance .
on the other hand if gains are your criteria then you have to live with the volatility . positive returns though are not guaranteed in either case .
my own preference has always been equity heavier since in my investing time frame stock cycles have been shorter than commodity and interest rate cycles .
when i abandoned the pp idea for my own model within days equty's crapped the bed .
then of course you say gee maybe the permanent portfolio is not such a bad thing .
then you see how easily stocks can roar back and watch the pp get clobbered and i go good choice .
there is never a time what you own will be the answer .
if low volatility is your goal then realize low volatility is no guarantee of performance .
on the other hand if gains are your criteria then you have to live with the volatility . positive returns though are not guaranteed in either case .
my own preference has always been equity heavier since in my investing time frame stock cycles have been shorter than commodity and interest rate cycles .
Last edited by mathjak107 on Wed Aug 26, 2015 5:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
Two excellent points in my opinion.mathjak107 wrote: if low volatility is your goal then realize low volatility is no guarantee of performance .
...stock cycles have been shorter than commodity and interest rate cycles.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
Pointedstick wrote: I think investing in assets you like and minimizing assets you don't is more important than we've all thought, because the assets you hate are the ones that make you question your plan at the worst possible time, and the ones you love are the ones whose wild rides you're more easily able to tolerate.
Very well said PointedStick. In my opinion the PP is a "framework". And as long as each person owns all the asset classes in the portions they’re comfortable with, that’s the best assurance they won’t change course during rough seas.
For example, I’m in the accumulation phase, and I like being overweight is stocks. So whenever there is a stock market dip, I'm a buyer.
FYI - On Monday I placed market orders for IJR and IJH shortly after the open, and noticed my broker took a very long time to fill them (like 15min). I believe there were temporary problems with the exchanges. They ended up filling near the bottom (I got lucky) and now my IJR position up +32% in 3 days! The fastest gain I've ever seen in my life!
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
From what I've seen (as a lurker for months), PS and others have been very good about being balanced with their opinions and qualifying them. I've not seen anyone say "the PP is the bestest, no downsides, everyone should allocate this way!". Instead, I've seen discussions of the tradeoffs, and often acknowledgements of what you're giving up when adopting the PP.buddtholomew wrote: The problem is "everything is not doing poorly", only the PP. You gave up returns from 2011-2015 invested in this allocation while telling everyone how great it was.
All we can do is choose the portfolio we think best aligns with our goals (growth, preservation, low-volatility, etc) and hope things work out the way we want. But we each individually make our choice.
Last edited by drumminj on Wed Aug 26, 2015 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
Exactly. That's why I don't post "gold is falling, woe is me!" whenever there is a gold bear market. I have no problems continuing my investment strategy even in the face of tremendous volatility in its assets, because it helps me sleep at night not to be so tied to the fortunes of the US government as I would be with any "normal" allocation.Pointedstick wrote: I think investing in assets you like and minimizing assets you don't is more important than we've all thought, because the assets you hate are the ones that make you question your plan at the worst possible time, and the ones you love are the ones whose wild rides you're more easily able to tolerate.
- I Shrugged
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2064
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:35 pm
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
In a zero interest rate environment, without much in the way of action, the PP is not going to produce much of a return. I've said so before but nobody agreed. Just a voice in the wilderness.... <sniffle>
Stay free, my friends.
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
Peak to trough, from 1/1/2011, CAGR of 4.37$, total 22.05%. I would have taken that return without even thinking over the past 4+ years!buddtholomew wrote:
Stocks plunge, gold and treasuries are flat.
Stocks plunge again, gold and treasuries decline.
Stocks rally, gold and treasuries get demolished.
See the pattern? I know...its only a week, blah, blah, blah. Same crap, different day. Been that way since 2011.
I think a bunch of us are seriously down on gold especially, and with stocks hammered as well, the normal, expected drop in gold ( ) just compounded the losses.
Everything I read, leads me to believe that gold is never perfectly inversely proportional to stocks. There is a delay. I can at this point seem to feel something is near:
--The crazy volatility swings
--China problems, including selling a boatload of US treasuries recently
--Continual hammering of gold when it is expected to shine
--Ukraine, ISIS, Greece, EU, etc
Something in the past few months feels like we are nearing some tipping point and there won't be many things left standing. My assumption/hope is that gold in some fashion shines then, and that it isn't so bad that it doesn't matter.
Test of the signature line
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
I think both of those assumptions will turn out to be true.Cortopassi wrote:Peak to trough, from 1/1/2011, CAGR of 4.37$, total 22.05%. I would have taken that return without even thinking over the past 4+ years!buddtholomew wrote:
Stocks plunge, gold and treasuries are flat.
Stocks plunge again, gold and treasuries decline.
Stocks rally, gold and treasuries get demolished.
See the pattern? I know...its only a week, blah, blah, blah. Same crap, different day. Been that way since 2011.
I think a bunch of us are seriously down on gold especially, and with stocks hammered as well, the normal, expected drop in gold ( ) just compounded the losses.
Everything I read, leads me to believe that gold is never perfectly inversely proportional to stocks. There is a delay. I can at this point seem to feel something is near:
--The crazy volatility swings
--China problems, including selling a boatload of US treasuries recently
--Continual hammering of gold when it is expected to shine
--Ukraine, ISIS, Greece, EU, etc
Something in the past few months feels like we are nearing some tipping point and there won't be many things left standing. My assumption/hope is that gold in some fashion shines then, and that it isn't so bad that it doesn't matter.
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
Funny, I just tried plugging in the last 3 years. Here's what I got:Cortopassi wrote:
Peak to trough, from 1/1/2011, CAGR of 4.37$, total 22.05%. I would have taken that return without even thinking over the past 4+ years!
Fatal error indeed.Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in /usr/local/ebs/web/sites/peaktotrough.com/hbpp.cgi on line 1027
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 1:49 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
Starting a portfolio and than changing course after three disappointing years is not a very good investment plan.
Any portfolio can have a bad couple of years and when you change now you will buy high/sell low.
Your IPS should protect you from recency bias.
Is it really that strange that the PP has been flat for a couple of years? It had a decade of exceptional returns!
Before that it under-performed a stock/bond portfolio for something like 20 years? 3 years is nothing.
Anyone starting in 2011/2012 did so after the out-performance of the PP. As usual, expected returns were lower going forward.
It's kinda strange to me that right now people are doubting the PP while to me it seems more attractive than it did 3 years ago.
Any portfolio can have a bad couple of years and when you change now you will buy high/sell low.
Your IPS should protect you from recency bias.
Is it really that strange that the PP has been flat for a couple of years? It had a decade of exceptional returns!
Before that it under-performed a stock/bond portfolio for something like 20 years? 3 years is nothing.
Anyone starting in 2011/2012 did so after the out-performance of the PP. As usual, expected returns were lower going forward.
It's kinda strange to me that right now people are doubting the PP while to me it seems more attractive than it did 3 years ago.
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
How do you figure? I would likely be rebalancing into equities the next time they are down and then just letting them become overweight, or if they become overweight from now on just let them stay overweight. I might also add new contributions to equities (actually I'm kind of doing this as my wife is just starting to invest and she's going for a hands-off target retirement fund -- it's not my money but it does change our combined AA). I don't plan to dump anything low.koekebakker wrote:
Any portfolio can have a bad couple of years and when you change now you will buy high/sell low.
Your IPS should protect you from recency bias.
- mathjak107
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4456
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
- Location: bayside queens ny
- Contact:
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
through the decades whenever i bought gold and actually owned it although i admit i never ever made money on it at any time i always had the vision that some how the time was right for gold .Cortopassi wrote:Peak to trough, from 1/1/2011, CAGR of 4.37$, total 22.05%. I would have taken that return without even thinking over the past 4+ years!buddtholomew wrote:
Stocks plunge, gold and treasuries are flat.
Stocks plunge again, gold and treasuries decline.
Stocks rally, gold and treasuries get demolished.
See the pattern? I know...its only a week, blah, blah, blah. Same crap, different day. Been that way since 2011.
I think a bunch of us are seriously down on gold especially, and with stocks hammered as well, the normal, expected drop in gold ( ) just compounded the losses.
Everything I read, leads me to believe that gold is never perfectly inversely proportional to stocks. There is a delay. I can at this point seem to feel something is near:
--The crazy volatility swings
--China problems, including selling a boatload of US treasuries recently
--Continual hammering of gold when it is expected to shine
--Ukraine, ISIS, Greece, EU, etc
Something in the past few months feels like we are nearing some tipping point and there won't be many things left standing. My assumption/hope is that gold in some fashion shines then, and that it isn't so bad that it doesn't matter.
but nope never happens for me and each time i sold it that vision of that time being right fades with it .
we tend to always have a picture that shows that we did the right thing and the turning point is very close .
but when we don't own it that thought is not on the radar .
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 220
- Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 12:36 am
- Location: New Hampshire, United States
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
Wow, even Pointedstick is thinking of throwing in the towel on the PP? I think the bottom is finally in.Pointedstick wrote: My current line of thinking is to move into a more Desert-like allocation (overweight stocks and underweight gold) during the next stock crash.
I started my PP in May 2012, and I'm up about 6.93%. Not great, but I'm not complaining because I'm worry-free, and I don't "hate" or "love" any of the assets. I don't really care enough about them to feel one way or the other, to be honest.
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14298
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
That is disheartening, isn't it. I think I'm comfortable with the pp as long as I can keep my stock-heavy vp. Conversely, I feel better about the vp because of the pp core.edsanville wrote:Wow, even Pointedstick is thinking of throwing in the towel on the PP? I think the bottom is finally in.Pointedstick wrote: My current line of thinking is to move into a more Desert-like allocation (overweight stocks and underweight gold) during the next stock crash.
- mathjak107
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4456
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
- Location: bayside queens ny
- Contact:
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
no different than when i ran the fidelity insight income model which is 26% stock and the 70/30 growth and income model at the same time . it really was a 45-50% equitymodel at the end of the day
in the end it really was a blend of both and no longer really was either one although i tracked them individually .
in the end it really was a blend of both and no longer really was either one although i tracked them individually .
Last edited by mathjak107 on Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
IMO everyone would be so much better off if they looked at their portfolios this way.mathjak107 wrote: no different than when i ran the fidelity insight income model which is 26% stock and the 70/30 growth and income model at the same time . it really was a 45-50% equitymodel at the end of the day
in the end it really was a blend of both and no longer really was either one although i tracked them individually .
Here's my PP money. Here's my VP money. And I hold a small Desert Portfolio with a dose of Boglehead. So many names when at the end of the day all that matters is your overall asset allocation.
- mathjak107
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4456
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
- Location: bayside queens ny
- Contact:
Re: PSA: I now have a 3-year period with no gains
a lot of times what we do is nothing more than a case of the emperors new clothes . it makes us feel better but it really is no different from what it actually is when looked at as one .