No where to hide
Moderator: Global Moderator
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2015 10:24 pm
Re: No where to hide
What's with government and traffic lights?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFOo3e0nxSI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFOo3e0nxSI
- Pointedstick
- Executive Member
- Posts: 8866
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: No where to hide
OMG CHAOS!!!!!!!!!! Don't you see! We need more CONTROL! Spontaneous order from chaos is an impossible, non-existent concept! Without a central authority we'll all be doooooooooooomed! Never mind that it appears to be working… it's just a ruse designed to lull you into a false sense of complacency! Soon there will be unspeakable, unimaginable calamities!AnotherSwede wrote: What's with government and traffic lights?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFOo3e0nxSI
Simonjester wrote:LMAOAnotherSwede wrote: What's with government and traffic lights?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFOo3e0nxSI
watch out!! the government may be on their way to your house right now for posting links to subversive videos...
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: No where to hide
We've all been at an intersection where the power is off and the lights are blinking red or off. I will agree that most times, you can actually get through faster.
But this was two different days, and you don't know if there was an accident one day out of camerashot or if NZ traffic is radically different on Mon vs. Tues. As well, all it takes is one person not familiar with the area, or not paying attention, to blow through and cause an accident.
When I have my self driving car, I am all for traffic lights going away...
But this was two different days, and you don't know if there was an accident one day out of camerashot or if NZ traffic is radically different on Mon vs. Tues. As well, all it takes is one person not familiar with the area, or not paying attention, to blow through and cause an accident.
When I have my self driving car, I am all for traffic lights going away...
Test of the signature line
Re: No where to hide
It might also be that the power being out led to a lot of people not going to work.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 4:20 am
Re: No where to hide
moda and stewardship,
Apologies have recently been discussed in "Best PLaces to Retire." This makes perfect sense to me. That was the big issue in the New Zealand conversation. You might wish to take your apology stuff there. The thread is, surprisingly, in "Other Discussions."
Will our thread on the Manhattan meet, which went well, be demoted to a general listing? I do not know how to do this. Nor do I know how to use the "buddy" feature.
Any help?
Apologies have recently been discussed in "Best PLaces to Retire." This makes perfect sense to me. That was the big issue in the New Zealand conversation. You might wish to take your apology stuff there. The thread is, surprisingly, in "Other Discussions."
Will our thread on the Manhattan meet, which went well, be demoted to a general listing? I do not know how to do this. Nor do I know how to use the "buddy" feature.
Any help?
Last edited by bedraggled on Fri May 15, 2015 2:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: No where to hide
Self-driving cars was also my first thought when the traffic lights argument was raised. If we don't have a government controlling traffic, we might devise alternative methods for road safety that don't involve lights at all. Self-driving cars might obviate the need for any road signs. It would be a completely private solution to a public problem.Cortopassi wrote: When I have my self driving car, I am all for traffic lights going away...
Re: No where to hide
Doesn't that all seem a bit odd to you?Pointedstick wrote:OMG CHAOS!!!!!!!!!! Don't you see! We need more CONTROL! Spontaneous order from chaos is an impossible, non-existent concept! Without a central authority we'll all be doooooooooooomed! Never mind that it appears to be working… it's just a ruse designed to lull you into a false sense of complacency! Soon there will be unspeakable, unimaginable calamities!AnotherSwede wrote: What's with government and traffic lights?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFOo3e0nxSI
First off, there's congestion down the road somewhere screwing up the whole thing. Is that another place where the light was changed to a stop?
Further, it appears that their IS a requirement to stop by a couple parties, so it's not just a free for all. And I think it's common knowledge that one-way stops are more efficient than lights as long as they don't get too over-crowded on the stop sign and favor the highway goers over those trying to get on it too much.
To me, lights are about balancing the traffic of what would be a completely one-directional congestion. They're not meant to actually reduce it overall. For the most part anyway. Obviously accidents factor in.
In my experience, four way stops and lights suck, but are necessary to balance congestion amongst various directions. Roundabouts are where it's at.
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."
- Thomas Paine
- Thomas Paine
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:04 am
Re: No where to hide
I live next to the roundabout capital of the U.S. and although they have their own issues, roundabouts do work pretty well, certainly better than 4-way stops. But surely there is someone somewhere that will fight to preserve the status quo to save the union jobs at all the traffic light and stop sign factories.moda0306 wrote: In my experience, four way stops and lights suck, but are necessary to balance congestion amongst various directions. Roundabouts are where it's at.
- Stewardship
- Executive Member
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:31 am
Re: No where to hide
Traffic could undoubtedly be optimized if the government weren't in charge of it. Traffic signals could function under better algorithms that allow traffic to proceed more efficiently for everyone.
This discussion reminds me of local candidates 20 years ago, before we had rush hour congestion, promising to prevent Los Angeles style traffic here in Las Vegas. What we have now is Los Angeles style traffic. No apologies from anyone there.
This discussion reminds me of local candidates 20 years ago, before we had rush hour congestion, promising to prevent Los Angeles style traffic here in Las Vegas. What we have now is Los Angeles style traffic. No apologies from anyone there.
In a world of ever-increasing financial intangibility and government imposition, I tend to expect otherwise.
- MachineGhost
- Executive Member
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am
Re: No where to hide
Wow, 16 pages of hand wringing again in just a bit over two weeks? I'm not going to even bother reading.
Some people need to get out of the PP. There's no shame in admitting defeat. There are less risky portfolios.
Some people need to get out of the PP. There's no shame in admitting defeat. There are less risky portfolios.
Last edited by MachineGhost on Sat May 16, 2015 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
- Stewardship
- Executive Member
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:31 am
Re: No where to hide
Such as?MachineGhost wrote: There are less risky portfolios.
In a world of ever-increasing financial intangibility and government imposition, I tend to expect otherwise.
- MachineGhost
- Executive Member
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am
Re: No where to hide
Burn's Fat Tail Minimization Portfolio.Stewardship wrote:Such as?MachineGhost wrote: There are less risky portfolios.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Re: No where to hide
Larry Swedroe?MachineGhost wrote:Burn's Fat Tail Minimization Portfolio.Stewardship wrote:Such as?MachineGhost wrote: There are less risky portfolios.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: No where to hide
I looked for that briefly and couldn't find it, so does it have any significant amount of gold? If not, I don't consider it low-risk.MachineGhost wrote:Burn's Fat Tail Minimization Portfolio.Stewardship wrote:Such as?MachineGhost wrote: There are less risky portfolios.
Re: No where to hide
MG must mean Swedroe's Fat Tail Minimization Portfolio (Burns is the Couch Potato guy). Swedroe's Fat Tail Minimization Portfolio is 30% stock (half small cap value and half emerging markets), 35% TIPS, and 35% short term treasuries. No gold (Swedroe does not like gold).Libertarian666 wrote:I looked for that briefly and couldn't find it, so does it have any significant amount of gold? If not, I don't consider it low-risk.MachineGhost wrote:Burn's Fat Tail Minimization Portfolio.Stewardship wrote: Such as?
- Stewardship
- Executive Member
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:31 am
Re: No where to hide
+1Libertarian666 wrote: I looked for that briefly and couldn't find it, so does it have any significant amount of gold? If not, I don't consider it low-risk.
In a world of ever-increasing financial intangibility and government imposition, I tend to expect otherwise.
Re: No where to hide
Well, I guess from that we can say that government works for you. Bully.Ad Orientem wrote: Harry Browne was a smart guy but he was not infallible. Stating that government never works is just silly.
That's great you have an opinion and are not afraid to voice it. I am happy to allow you your opinion. My only wish -- it is a simple wish -- is that those of your point of view would allow me to have mine.
Seems only civilized.
But then, perhaps I'm "just silly."
Re: No where to hide
On where to hide: if the Permanent Portfolio is performing badly, perhaps the first question to ask should be:Stewardship wrote: Apologies for the conversation drift. I'll start a new thread if I want to discuss the different possible options for sewage
What economic state are we in?
Prosperity? Recession? Inflation? Deflation?
So what is the answer? If you have no answer to that question, perhaps best to hold off on action until you do have an answer. Otherwise, you're walking off blindfolded, and in a place with an awful lot of cliffs.
Re: No where to hide
Legendary Vanguard Group founder Jack Bogle warns that there is an "awful lot" to fear in the current stock market and investors have few “good options.”
"This is a hard time to invest because there aren't a lot of good options to stocks, and bond yields are extremely low," he told CNBC.
He said the Federal Reserve’s continued insistence on low interest rates has only artificially boosted stock prices.
"That's a scary thing because it can't stay that way forever," he said. "So, I do advocate a cautious approach to investing."
http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/StreetTa ... id/645782/
Cash anyone?
"This is a hard time to invest because there aren't a lot of good options to stocks, and bond yields are extremely low," he told CNBC.
He said the Federal Reserve’s continued insistence on low interest rates has only artificially boosted stock prices.
"That's a scary thing because it can't stay that way forever," he said. "So, I do advocate a cautious approach to investing."
http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/StreetTa ... id/645782/
Cash anyone?
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: No where to hide
He also mentioned to stay out of long-term treasuries...sure wish he added unless they are part of a well diversified portfolio.Reub wrote: Legendary Vanguard Group founder Jack Bogle warns that there is an "awful lot" to fear in the current stock market and investors have few “good options.”
"This is a hard time to invest because there aren't a lot of good options to stocks, and bond yields are extremely low," he told CNBC.
He said the Federal Reserve’s continued insistence on low interest rates has only artificially boosted stock prices.
"That's a scary thing because it can't stay that way forever," he said. "So, I do advocate a cautious approach to investing."
http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/StreetTa ... id/645782/
Cash anyone?
Poor guy...CNBC asked what he would tell the young investor who believes the entire market is manipulated? Mr. Bogle calmly attempted to explain dividends and earnings...I'm certain if any young investors were listening they most certainly would have already tuned out!
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
- Stewardship
- Executive Member
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:31 am
Re: No where to hide
So he didn't answer the question?buddtholomew wrote: Poor guy...CNBC asked what he would tell the young investor who believes the entire market is manipulated? Mr. Bogle calmly attempted to explain dividends and earnings...
In a world of ever-increasing financial intangibility and government imposition, I tend to expect otherwise.
Re: No where to hide
The PP really sucks recently! Is it yesterday's news?buddtholomew wrote:He also mentioned to stay out of long-term treasuries...sure wish he added unless they are part of a well diversified portfolio.Reub wrote: Legendary Vanguard Group founder Jack Bogle warns that there is an "awful lot" to fear in the current stock market and investors have few “good options.”
"This is a hard time to invest because there aren't a lot of good options to stocks, and bond yields are extremely low," he told CNBC.
He said the Federal Reserve’s continued insistence on low interest rates has only artificially boosted stock prices.
"That's a scary thing because it can't stay that way forever," he said. "So, I do advocate a cautious approach to investing."
http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/StreetTa ... id/645782/
Cash anyone?
Poor guy...CNBC asked what he would tell the young investor who believes the entire market is manipulated? Mr. Bogle calmly attempted to explain dividends and earnings...I'm certain if any young investors were listening they most certainly would have already tuned out!
As I said once before, the place to hide is in cash.
- I Shrugged
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2064
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:35 pm
Re: No where to hide
deflationLC475 wrote:
What economic state are we in?
Prosperity? Recession? Inflation? Deflation?
Stay free, my friends.
Re: No where to hide
Deflation, and no help from bonds!
Re: No where to hide
Since 2008 we are in the midst of a massive deleveraging which I think so far is generally deflationary.LC475 wrote: What economic state are we in?
Prosperity? Recession? Inflation? Deflation?
Yes, not in the short term but bonds performed strongly in 2008, 2011 & 2014. I'm not ready to dump mine yet. Ride them when they are doing well, take some profits, endure some bond pain, and (hopefully) repeat.ochotona wrote: Deflation, and no help from bonds!