CAGR over time

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
boruseek
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 9:56 am

CAGR over time

Post by boruseek »

Hello everyone - my first post here, but I've been invested in the PP for a number of years.

Has anyone noticed that the PP CAGR is going down over time. Using performance data from craig's blog and calculating the CAGR every year starting with 1972, this is what we get:

[img width=500]http://s2.postimg.org/r6vf0mp6x/pp_cagr.png[/img]

My personal opinion is that this is due to the rates trending down from 1980s and in particular because of the very low interest rates in the past decade. Does anyone have any other explanations as to why this is the case? Do you think this trend will continue?

Thanks,
boruseek
Last edited by boruseek on Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4402
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: CAGR over time

Post by Xan »

Inflation is going to skew these results.  I think those are nominal returns rather than real.  What you have here is a graph (more or less) of inflation getting lower.
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8866
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: CAGR over time

Post by Pointedstick »

That's a nominal graph; adjusting it to be real would probably make it clear that inflation has been falling too, blunting the effect.

In other words, the PP is still doing its job of giving you a low but stable real return. It just looked more dramatic during the time when inflation was 5-10%
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
boruseek
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 9:56 am

Re: CAGR over time

Post by boruseek »

This is a very good point. Thanks for the replies.
boruseek
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 9:56 am

Re: CAGR over time

Post by boruseek »

The real CAGR looks much better with consistent 5% real return:

[img width=500]http://s28.postimg.org/rustwdl3h/pp_cagr_real.png[/img]

Thanks,
boruseek
Last edited by boruseek on Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Tyler
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2066
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 3:23 pm
Contact:

Re: CAGR over time

Post by Tyler »

Nice graph!
stuper1
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1365
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:18 pm

Re: CAGR over time

Post by stuper1 »

Does that graph show a rolling x-year average CAGR?  It must, because the CAGR in 2013 was negative.
iwealth
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 409
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:45 pm

Re: CAGR over time

Post by iwealth »

I'm guessing it's CAGR since inception.
boruseek
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 9:56 am

Re: CAGR over time

Post by boruseek »

Yes, every data point is CAGR since 1972 to that year.
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4402
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: CAGR over time

Post by Xan »

That approach would make any investing strategy appear to start out rough and then gradually get very smooth as it approaches the current time.
User avatar
Gosso
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1052
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:22 am
Location: Canada

Re: CAGR over time

Post by Gosso »

Here's the rolling real CAGR:

[img width=500]http://i61.tinypic.com/jzb61e.png[/img]
Post Reply