2 months old PP, down -3%.

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by Libertarian666 » Wed Jun 26, 2013 4:18 pm

Xan wrote:   I believe that buying high and selling low is a pretty good way to lose money.
Now you tell us!  :P
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8864
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by Pointedstick » Wed Jun 26, 2013 4:24 pm

In all seriousness, catacomb, we're all sorry to see you leave. I think probably the most important part of investing is matching your portfolio not so much to your desired return but your your psychological motivations. If you know that you are extremely conservative and risk-averse with money, then the PP in its unadulterated form may well be too risky, as I believe we're seeing right now.

If you like the theory behind the PP but dislike its present level of volatility, it's always easy to water down the volatile assets with cash and retain a measure of the all-weather protection with less volatility. But be wary: too much cash and you risk losing your purchasing power in an almost guaranteed manner. There is no truly "safe" place to put money. That's one of its curses: once you have it, you become eternally bedeviled by the problem of how to protect it.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by Libertarian666 » Wed Jun 26, 2013 4:57 pm

So does this mean that capitulation is officially here, so we can start going back up? I know I used to be a phenomenal contrary indicator myself. My greatest achievement in that respect was buying silver on margin on the day of the top in 1980, a record few people can match! Or would want to...  :P
User avatar
Tyler
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2066
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 3:23 pm
Contact:

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by Tyler » Wed Jun 26, 2013 5:52 pm

catacomb wrote: I learned a lot from this forum and from the book but i genuinely no longer trust the PP as a viable investment strategy for the current economic environment. The theory sounds fantastic but it does not hold. The strategy proved to be way too volatile and risky for my liking and I certainly would not recommend it to newbies.
Catacomb -- I sincerely hope you find an investing strategy that works for you.  I feel inclined to note, however, that based on your posts you only invested in the PP for 2-3 months.  Generally speaking, that is not enough time to fairly evaluate any investment strategy.  Almost anything you invest in can show that level of volatility (or more) over the short term.  It's the long game that counts.

It sounds like something closer to cash is more what you're looking for from a volatility perspective, which is just fine.  However, if one changes direction every few months based on how the winds are blowing, he is likely to sail in circles.  The problem may not be the underlying investment strategy, but the strength of his rudder. 

My hope for everyone is that they find an investment strategy they believe in enough to stick with even in tough times.  For me it's the PP.  For others it may be something else.  To all, happy sailing.
Last edited by Tyler on Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
JMoyle
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:37 pm

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by JMoyle » Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:04 pm

I almost feel sorry for Catacomb... until, I remember losing over $200,000.00 in 2008-2009 with my Boglehead-type Portfolio. No one that I know or follow... I mean no one... saw that coming! Not even Bob Brinker, the MarketTimer! At least Goldman Sachs predicted the sell down of gold back in May.

Having said that, Harry, Craig, and Medium Tex expressed in their respective books that the Permanent Portfolio should protect against a large asset class price drawdown. With gold down over 30%, the "total" Permanent Portfolio is down around 6%-7%. Gold's current fall is clear evidence of a major element in Harry's, Craig's, and Medium Tex's theory - Porfolio Protection! We do not have to look backward and argue about economic eras to prove this trait of the Permanent Portfolio.

Another investing lesson that Catacomb has not learned... accumulating more shares at the cheapest possible price. If an market asset did not fall occasionally, investors would never have the opportunity to buy an asset while it was "on sale" and accumulate more shares/ounces.  Gold is almost "on sale" again and I am about to buy according to my rebalancing bands (the Permanent Porfolio's indicator of "on sale" assets)! Obviously, Catacomb does not understand the differences between being a market investor and a market speculator. If he/she keeps buying high and selling low, his/her investing education will be very expensive.

This may sound crazy to Catacomb but I hope Gold keeps falling at least until I can reach a rebalancing band (i.e. an "on sale" price)! I still have Gold bought from people who believed $225.00 per ounce was too expensive and just wanted out of the market! I love it when people are selling what I want to own at low market prices! Lower prices = more share/ounces!
User avatar
ozzy
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 9:34 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida
Contact:

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by ozzy » Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:04 pm

Well said JMoyle.

I too am buying physical gold as my gold portion is getting close to 15%. I just ordered a couple 1oz buffalo coin today.

I have no fear at all.  I've done extensive research and I believe the PP is the safest, simplest, neutral, non-speculative portfolio available. 

I’m down about 7% and not losing any sleep.  I still have 20 more years until retirement so I’m in this for the long haul. 
The only thing that would make me rethink the PP is two consecutive years of a 10% or greater loss.  Other than that I’m a believer.
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by MediumTex » Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:13 pm

catacomb,

I echo what others are saying above (mostly).

I'm sorry to hear that your experience with the PP was not a happy one.  We all have to do what makes sense to us as individuals, and it sounds like you are no longer comfortable with the PP, which is a perfectly valid rationale for moving on to something else.

None of us knows what the future holds, and the PP helps to protect against a lot of that uncertainty, but there are periods of volatility in any portfolio and right now the PP is experiencing some rough waters.

Craig and I try to provide as much information and explanation of our understanding of the theory behind the PP and how and why it has worked historically, but ultimately it is critically important for each individual investor to make sure that he has come to his own understanding of how and why the PP works and has decided for himself whether the portfolio is right for him after his own reasoned analysis.  However persuasive anything I write may be, it is still just the product of one mind among millions that are all trying to fathom an unknown (and un-knowable) future.

I have satisfied myself that the PP is a sound investment strategy for me, but it isn't for everyone, and it is times like these that should remind us all that without conviction about an investment strategy (whichever strategy you may choose to use), any extended period of volatility or downward drift may cause you to give up at the worst possible time. 

I've always thought it was unrealistic to ask most human beings to cope with the kind of regular drawdowns that many traditional investment strategies tend to deliver, and the PP is better in many respect (IMHO) because its drawdowns are typically much less traumatic than those delivered by most other strategies that attempt to provide positive real returns.  But low volatility doesn't mean no volatility.

Best of luck and I hope you still check in from time to time. 
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
timerscraw
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:22 pm

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by timerscraw » Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:58 pm

This may not be the best spot for this after what Catacomb posted, but how is everyone tracking their rebalancing bands?

Do you all just use a spreadsheet, and manually update the data based on the current day's prices?

I've downloaded some of the spreadsheets on the forum previously, but I'm wondering if there is a better way to be "up-to-date" without this manual step.

Thanks!
rickb
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 762
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:12 am

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by rickb » Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:14 pm

timerscraw wrote: This may not be the best spot for this after what Catacomb posted, but how is everyone tracking their rebalancing bands?

Do you all just use a spreadsheet, and manually update the data based on the current day's prices?

I've downloaded some of the spreadsheets on the forum previously, but I'm wondering if there is a better way to be "up-to-date" without this manual step.

Thanks!
The spreadsheets mentioned in this thread, download current price data automatically from various websites.  Another approach is to set up a model of your own portfolio on a website that tracks portfolio values, such as Morningstar or Google or Yahoo (see this thread).  However you do it, there's likely to be some manual effort since the tool won't know when you buy or sell anything (and may or may not track dividends appropriately).
User avatar
rocketdog
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 688
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:35 pm

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by rocketdog » Thu Jun 27, 2013 8:51 am

Libertarian666 wrote:
rocketdog wrote:
cnh wrote: 90% bonds? Unless they're all ultra short-term, you'll get crushed when interest rates normalize, which they will.  If you're smarter and faster than all the professional bond traders, financial "insiders," FED, ECB, etc, then....
You can avoid catastrophe with bonds by purchasing high-quality bonds directly, rather than by using funds.  At least that way you know you'll at least get your principle back when the bond matures... if you can resist selling it before then, that is.
But unfortunately you won't know what that principal will be worth when you get it back.
Which is just another example of the fact that there is no such thing as a riskless investment; all you can do is try to pick the risks that are the least distressing to you.
What do you mean?  If you buy a 5-year bond for $1,000 and hold it to maturity, you get your entire $1,000 back. 
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
- H. L. Mencken
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8864
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by Pointedstick » Thu Jun 27, 2013 8:57 am

rocketdog wrote: What do you mean?  If you buy a 5-year bond for $1,000 and hold it to maturity, you get your entire $1,000 back.
I think what he's getting to is that if there's, say, 10% inflation during every one of those years, that $1,000 you get back will only have the purchasing power of $590.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
User avatar
rocketdog
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 688
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:35 pm

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by rocketdog » Thu Jun 27, 2013 8:59 am

timerscraw wrote: This may not be the best spot for this after what Catacomb posted, but how is everyone tracking their rebalancing bands?

Do you all just use a spreadsheet, and manually update the data based on the current day's prices?

I've downloaded some of the spreadsheets on the forum previously, but I'm wondering if there is a better way to be "up-to-date" without this manual step.

Thanks!
Daily updates?  Yeesh.  You're bound to get yourself all worked up over nothing. 

I maintain a spreadsheet that I manually update once a month when my statements come out (or once a quarter in the case of my wife's 401K).  I haven't been in the PP long enough to hit a rebalance band yet, and I don't have a lot invested in my PP at this point.  So even if I did hit a rebalance band I'd probably just add cash to the "losing" asset to bring things back into balance instead of selling off some of my "winning" assets. 
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
- H. L. Mencken
User avatar
rocketdog
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 688
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:35 pm

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by rocketdog » Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:01 am

Pointedstick wrote:
rocketdog wrote: What do you mean?  If you buy a 5-year bond for $1,000 and hold it to maturity, you get your entire $1,000 back.
I think what he's getting to is that if there's, say, 10% inflation during every one of those years, that $1,000 you get back will only have the purchasing power of $590.
10% inflation for 5 years running?  Where the hell do you live... the Weimar Republic?  ;)
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
- H. L. Mencken
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8864
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by Pointedstick » Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:04 am

rocketdog wrote:
Pointedstick wrote:
rocketdog wrote: What do you mean?  If you buy a 5-year bond for $1,000 and hold it to maturity, you get your entire $1,000 back.
I think what he's getting to is that if there's, say, 10% inflation during every one of those years, that $1,000 you get back will only have the purchasing power of $590.
10% inflation for 5 years running?  Where the hell do you live... the Weimar Republic?  ;)
No prediction of the sort; it was merely used as an illustration. But I suspect it's high on Libertarian666's list of things to worry about. :)
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by Libertarian666 » Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:51 pm

Pointedstick wrote:
rocketdog wrote:
Pointedstick wrote: I think what he's getting to is that if there's, say, 10% inflation during every one of those years, that $1,000 you get back will only have the purchasing power of $590.
10% inflation for 5 years running?  Where the hell do you live... the Weimar Republic?  ;)
No prediction of the sort; it was merely used as an illustration. But I suspect it's high on Libertarian666's list of things to worry about. :)
How did you guess?
So can I count on you to explain my comments in the future if I'm not available? That is another thing I don't have to worry about then.  ;D
User avatar
annieB
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:23 pm
Location: Brentwood,Tennessee

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by annieB » Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:30 pm

And we were feeling sorry for Catacomb.
Guy will probably start a newsletter.
Freakin gold...
User avatar
foglifter
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 634
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:37 pm
Location: The Golden State

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by foglifter » Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:54 pm

I'm glad I didn't post a screenshot of my IAU position that I bought in January. That would be in the wrong place at the wrong time. I'm not easily spooked by red ink anymore. PP does change investor's mentality.  8)
"Let every man divide his money into three parts, and invest a third in land, a third in business, and a third let him keep in reserve."
- Talmud
User avatar
rocketdog
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 688
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:35 pm

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by rocketdog » Thu Jun 27, 2013 3:05 pm

I don't know about anyone else, but when I made my initial PP buy-in I told myself that no matter when I took the plunge at least one of the assets I bought was going to start losing money almost immediately.  But I was wrong... because two of the assets started losing money almost immediately!  :o

Ah well, it just means that more buying opportunities lie ahead...
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
- H. L. Mencken
User avatar
annieB
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:23 pm
Location: Brentwood,Tennessee

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by annieB » Thu Jun 27, 2013 3:10 pm

Fog:

I too was smarter in January!
User avatar
frugal
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 947
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:49 pm

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by frugal » Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:24 am

For me it is also difficult to see the PP going down.

What I don't understand is:

Catacomb, which % DD was your limit?

7%? to quit?
Live healthy, live actively and live life!
deke99
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:11 am

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by deke99 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:13 am

rocketdog wrote:
Pointedstick wrote:
rocketdog wrote: What do you mean?  If you buy a 5-year bond for $1,000 and hold it to maturity, you get your entire $1,000 back.
I think what he's getting to is that if there's, say, 10% inflation during every one of those years, that $1,000 you get back will only have the purchasing power of $590.
10% inflation for 5 years running?  Where the hell do you live... the Weimar Republic?  ;)
More like the Carter administration.
Robert
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 11:29 am

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by Robert » Mon Jul 01, 2013 10:53 am

You're upset about a single digit paper decline for a 2 month old portfolio!?!?!?! This can't be serious. If this post is for real I would respectfully say that you really don't understand investment risk and should be in T Bills, CD's and I Bonds. 2 months is a trade, that's not investing.
rickb
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 762
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:12 am

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by rickb » Sun Jul 07, 2013 1:20 am

rickb wrote:
Gosso wrote: As you can see there is quite a bit of volatility in the monthly returns. But over the course of the year it typically balances out.
Indeed.  Here are several years of monthly and rolling 12-month returns for an idealized PP consisting of 25% each TLT, GLD, SHY, and VTI (rebalanced monthly, dividends included, no tax and no fees)


          Month  Previous 12 months
Jul-2010  +0.30%    +12.03%
Aug-2010  +2.39%    +13.15%
Sep-2010  +2.95%    +12.98%
Oct-2010  +0.87%    +14.46%
Nov-2010  +0.18%      +9.16%
Dec-2010  +1.28%    +14.36%
Jan-2011  -1.71%    +12.19%
Feb-2011  +2.80%    +14.02%
Mar-2011  +0.48%    +13.51%
Apr-2011  +3.67%    +14.46%
May-2011  +0.13%    +14.53%
Jun-2011  -1.54%    +12.46%
Jul-2011  +2.71%    +15.18%
Aug-2011  +4.03%    +17.19%
Sep-2011  -1.39%    +11.04%
Oct-2011  +3.37%    +13.59%
Nov-2011  +0.83%    +14.36%
Dec-2011  -1.50%    +11.32%
Jan-2012  +3.99%    +17.97%
Feb-2012  -0.31%    +14.04%
Mar-2012  -0.64%    +12.53%
Apr-2012  +1.06%      +9.87%
May-2012  -0.88%      +9.07%
Jun-2012  +1.15%    +11.83%
Jul-2012  +1.43%    +10.60%
Aug-2012  +1.58%      +8.05%
Sep-2012  +1.16%    +11.17%
Oct-2012  -1.92%      +5.41%
Nov-2012  +1.00%      +5.58%
Dec-2012  -0.89%      +6.34%
Jan-2013  +0.41%      +2.90%
Feb-2013  -0.54%      +1.08%
Mar-2013  +1.08%      +4.34%
Apr-2013  -0.62%      +2.79%
May-2013  -2.30%      +1.97%


[Edit: Include the data]
The June data is -3.86% for the month and -2.93% for the rolling 12-month window.  This is the first negative rolling 12-month window in the last 3+ years.
koekebakker
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 1:49 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by koekebakker » Wed Jul 31, 2013 12:29 am

Seems like Catacomb is back, after the 'crash and burn' of his PP:

http://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtop ... 1&t=120624

Could be another Israeli investor off course although him mentioning Early Retirement Extreme makes it unlikely.

Recency bias... go!
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: 2 months old PP, down -3%.

Post by MediumTex » Wed Jul 31, 2013 12:38 am

koekebakker wrote: Seems like Catacomb is back, after the 'crash and burn' of his PP:

http://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtop ... 1&t=120624

Could be another Israeli investor off course although him mentioning Early Retirement Extreme makes it unlikely.

Recency bias... go!
I'm certain that's him.  I hope he finds an allocation that works well for him.  Feeling adrift with your life savings is no fun at all.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
Post Reply