Tyler, way to throw me off by using red to represent a gain?
Search found 6 matches
- Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:14 pm
- Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
- Topic: Worst 3 year PP performance ever?
- Replies: 124
- Views: 65500
Re: Worst 3 year PP performance ever?
Oh yeah, you're right. Thanks!
Tyler, way to throw me off by using red to represent a gain?
Tyler, way to throw me off by using red to represent a gain?
- Sat Jul 04, 2015 6:58 am
- Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
- Topic: Worst 3 year PP performance ever?
- Replies: 124
- Views: 65500
Re: Worst 3 year PP performance ever?
Hi Tyler, Appreciate your work. Can you clarify what this chart is showing? It looks like if you had invested in 1999, the real CAGR would have been negative for 7 years. This is inconsistent with your other charts and my own work. Thanks. Here's another way to visualize the same data above. [img wi...
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 3:05 pm
- Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
- Topic: CAGR over time
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4694
Re: CAGR over time
Yes, every data point is CAGR since 1972 to that year.
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:50 pm
- Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
- Topic: CAGR over time
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4694
Re: CAGR over time
The real CAGR looks much better with consistent 5% real return:
[img width=500]http://s28.postimg.org/rustwdl3h/pp_cagr_real.png[/img]
Thanks,
boruseek
[img width=500]http://s28.postimg.org/rustwdl3h/pp_cagr_real.png[/img]
Thanks,
boruseek
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:30 am
- Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
- Topic: CAGR over time
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4694
Re: CAGR over time
This is a very good point. Thanks for the replies.
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:22 am
- Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
- Topic: CAGR over time
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4694
CAGR over time
Hello everyone - my first post here, but I've been invested in the PP for a number of years. Has anyone noticed that the PP CAGR is going down over time. Using performance data from craig's blog and calculating the CAGR every year starting with 1972, this is what we get: [img width=500]http://s2.pos...