Search found 6 matches

by boruseek
Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:14 pm
Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
Topic: Worst 3 year PP performance ever?
Replies: 124
Views: 62599

Re: Worst 3 year PP performance ever?

Oh yeah, you're right. Thanks!

Tyler, way to throw me off by using red to represent a gain? ;D
by boruseek
Sat Jul 04, 2015 6:58 am
Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
Topic: Worst 3 year PP performance ever?
Replies: 124
Views: 62599

Re: Worst 3 year PP performance ever?

Hi Tyler, Appreciate your work. Can you clarify what this chart is showing? It looks like if you had invested in 1999, the real CAGR would have been negative for 7 years. This is inconsistent with your other charts and my own work. Thanks. Here's another way to visualize the same data above. [img wi...
by boruseek
Thu Nov 13, 2014 3:05 pm
Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
Topic: CAGR over time
Replies: 10
Views: 4412

Re: CAGR over time

Yes, every data point is CAGR since 1972 to that year.
by boruseek
Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:50 pm
Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
Topic: CAGR over time
Replies: 10
Views: 4412

Re: CAGR over time

The real CAGR looks much better with consistent 5% real return:

[img width=500]http://s28.postimg.org/rustwdl3h/pp_cagr_real.png[/img]

Thanks,
boruseek
by boruseek
Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:30 am
Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
Topic: CAGR over time
Replies: 10
Views: 4412

Re: CAGR over time

This is a very good point. Thanks for the replies.
by boruseek
Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:22 am
Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
Topic: CAGR over time
Replies: 10
Views: 4412

CAGR over time

Hello everyone - my first post here, but I've been invested in the PP for a number of years. Has anyone noticed that the PP CAGR is going down over time. Using performance data from craig's blog and calculating the CAGR every year starting with 1972, this is what we get: [img width=500]http://s2.pos...