Search found 88 matches
- Mon Mar 31, 2025 4:44 pm
- Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
- Topic: Golden Butterfly rebalancing bands
- Replies: 29
- Views: 19336
Re: Golden Butterfly rebalancing bands
3. Harry Browne allows for 40% swings in the PP (15% and 35% bands) It's true that Harry Browne set the rebalancing bands at 15% and 35%, but I don't know if he crunched the numbers. FWIW, Gobind Daryanani's paper "Opportunistic Rebalancing: A New Paradigm for Wealth Managers" indicates t...
- Sat Mar 29, 2025 5:50 pm
- Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
- Topic: Golden Butterfly rebalancing bands
- Replies: 29
- Views: 19336
Re: Golden Butterfly rebalancing bands
3. Harry Browne allows for 40% swings in the PP (15% and 35% bands) It's true that Harry Browne set the rebalancing bands at 15% and 35%, but I don't know if he crunched the numbers. FWIW, Gobind Daryanani's paper "Opportunistic Rebalancing: A New Paradigm for Wealth Managers" indicates t...
- Sat Dec 28, 2024 6:10 pm
- Forum: Gold
- Topic: 2025 Gold Forecasts
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8786
2025 Gold Forecasts
According to the WSJ: "Analysts at JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs and Citigroup share a price target of $3,000" an ounce in 2025. The reasons: lower interest rates, geopolitical uncertainty, central bank buying, little industrial demand, and momentum. More details at https://www.wsj.com/finance/c...
- Sun Dec 01, 2024 2:53 pm
- Forum: Bonds
- Topic: "U.S. Treasuries not the safe bet they once were"
- Replies: 77
- Views: 50681
Re: "U.S. Treasuries not the safe bet they once were"
I don't know if Warren Buffett's choices for Berkshire offer anything actionable for individual investors. … He's always believed on having ample cash on hand to be able to take advantage of buying opportunities. … Looking at the context of the whole post, I thought stpeter was talking about advice...
- Sun Dec 01, 2024 12:40 pm
- Forum: Bonds
- Topic: "U.S. Treasuries not the safe bet they once were"
- Replies: 77
- Views: 50681
Re: "U.S. Treasuries not the safe bet they once were"
I guess the question is how much "Insurance" (long bonds and gold) to own. Cullen Roche suggests 10% of each, but in most of the portfolio testing I've done it takes 15-20% gold to offer meaningful protection against sequence-of-returns-risk in retirement and/or to offset stock and bond m...
- Sun Dec 01, 2024 12:32 pm
- Forum: Bonds
- Topic: "U.S. Treasuries not the safe bet they once were"
- Replies: 77
- Views: 50681
Re: "U.S. Treasuries not the safe bet they once were"
... the Fed has more legal power to print than when the PP was concocted. Im treating long bonds like gold, as insurance. You want most of your wealth in real assets that do work ie they are worth 100,000 widgets and they produce 1,000 widgets per month. So, a business or rental property. Basically...
- Sat Nov 30, 2024 7:17 pm
- Forum: Bonds
- Topic: "U.S. Treasuries not the safe bet they once were"
- Replies: 77
- Views: 50681
Re: "U.S. Treasuries not the safe bet they once were"
Having rebalancing bands and sticking to them certainly helps most of the time - but not all of the time. Just look at what happened in 2022: VTI: -19.51% TLT: -31.41% GLD: -.077% SGOV (T-Bills) 1.58% And looking at market history, it is not at all uncommon for bonds and stocks to tank simultaneous...
- Sat Nov 30, 2024 6:59 pm
- Forum: Bonds
- Topic: "U.S. Treasuries not the safe bet they once were"
- Replies: 77
- Views: 50681
Re: "U.S. Treasuries not the safe bet they once were"
I find it helpful to look at where gold and LTT's fit in his Defined Duration chart: https://disciplinefunds.com/defined-duration-investing/ You can see how both gold and LTT's are super long-duration assets that act as insurance when anomalous or "black swan" type events occur. Well, gol...
- Sat Nov 30, 2024 1:32 pm
- Forum: Bonds
- Topic: "U.S. Treasuries not the safe bet they once were"
- Replies: 77
- Views: 50681
Re: "U.S. Treasuries not the safe bet they once were"
Like Hal, I've been meaning to start a thread on this topic, so thanks to all for your contributions. Deflation is the least likely scenario: it has happened just twice in U.S. history (1930-33 during the Great Depression and briefly from 2007-2009 during the GFC). It makes the least send of all to ...
- Sat Nov 30, 2024 11:12 am
- Forum: Gold
- Topic: Texas introduces GAULT legislation
- Replies: 10
- Views: 8487
Re: Texas introduces GAULT legislation
But I won't hold metals at the Tx Bullion Depo... it's too darn costly! I looked at it once, spun away immediately. I can't quote you a number, but it must have been bad because it gave me a concussion and short term memory loss. On the other hand, I've been pretty happy with Texas Precious Metals ...
- Fri Nov 22, 2024 6:02 pm
- Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
- Topic: Does it make sense to start at 4x25?
- Replies: 33
- Views: 20282
Re: Does it make sense to start at 4x25?
For traditional IRA types ... it ends up all the same with having it there or in taxable. Both taxed at ordinary income rates. Could be a different story for Roth IRA types. Only true if your marginal tax rate is the same when you're working as when you retire. In most case it isn't, your tax rate ...
- Mon Nov 11, 2024 4:46 pm
- Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
- Topic: Does it make sense to start at 4x25?
- Replies: 33
- Views: 20282
Re: Does it make sense to start at 4x25?
Agreed. When I started with the PP, I DCA'd my way in over the course of 18-24 months. 12 might be easier and more reasonable, though.
- Thu Oct 03, 2024 7:20 pm
- Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
- Topic: New Here - What are folks investing in
- Replies: 42
- Views: 35775
Re: New Here - What are folks investing in
I follow the standard 4x25 PP with a 20/30 (not 15/35) rebalancing band. Keeping things simple enables me to sleep well at night, and makes rebalancing easier. But if I had to do it over I might have done the Golden Butterfly from the start, and I'm still considering a switch to GB.
- Fri Feb 09, 2024 6:46 pm
- Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
- Topic: Rebalancing and Timing
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3892
Re: Rebalancing and Timing
To avoid this dilemma, I set a fixed day in the year in which I check the bands (20/30 in my case). If the portfolio has hit the bands at this specific date, I rebalance. The rest of the days I do nothing with it. As you will only check (and maybe rebalance) once a year, you can use narrower rebala...
- Wed Feb 07, 2024 5:05 pm
- Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
- Topic: Rebalancing and Timing
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3892
Re: Rebalancing and Timing
Thanks to you both for sharing your perspective. It's good to know I'm not the only one. :-)
- Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:22 pm
- Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
- Topic: Rebalancing and Timing
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3892
Rebalancing and Timing
No matter what bands you use, when you get close to a rebalancing point you need to decide when exactly to pull the trigger. Yet from one perspective this goes against the PP policy of not checking your portfolio all the time and not trying to time the markets. As an example, back in October I think...
- Thu Oct 12, 2023 11:21 am
- Forum: Bonds
- Topic: Bond Yields and Withdrawal Rates
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3706
Bond Yields and Withdrawal Rates
Here's another way to look at the challenging market for long-term bonds...
https://www.morningstar.com/bonds/bonds ... irees-gain
I suppose every cloud has a silver lining!
https://www.morningstar.com/bonds/bonds ... irees-gain
I suppose every cloud has a silver lining!
- Sat Jul 29, 2023 2:35 pm
- Forum: Bonds
- Topic: Attention! Mathjak!!!!
- Replies: 19
- Views: 5732
Re: Attention! Mathjak!!!!
IMHO, no sentence should include both "permanent portfolio" and "ideal time to invest". ;-) O0 I have been guilty of that, but mainly of saying it’s an ideal time to invest in the (entire) pp. There's an old proverb: the best time to plant a tree was 80 years ago; the second bes...
- Fri Jul 28, 2023 7:58 pm
- Forum: Bonds
- Topic: Attention! Mathjak!!!!
- Replies: 19
- Views: 5732
Re: Attention! Mathjak!!!!
What if you had decided that it was today you were converting you existing portfolio to the Permanent Portfolio. Would you think that it was a good time to be buying the long-term bond portion? It never matters regarding the cash portion. Seems like not that bad a time to be buying the gold portion...
- Fri Jul 28, 2023 5:00 pm
- Forum: Bonds
- Topic: Attention! Mathjak!!!!
- Replies: 19
- Views: 5732
Re: Attention! Mathjak!!!!
I'll rephrase to do you think in looking back at it you could have been glad to have made a substantial long-term bond purchase today? No, because that means I would have been timing the market. Every occurrence of happiness over a successful big purchase would be counterbalanced by an occurrence o...
- Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:02 pm
- Forum: Bonds
- Topic: Attention! Mathjak!!!!
- Replies: 19
- Views: 5732
- Wed Jul 05, 2023 6:27 pm
- Forum: Gold
- Topic: Gold bars on sale at Costco
- Replies: 15
- Views: 36751
Re: Gold bars on sale at Costco
When I search for "Gold Bar" after logging into the Costco website, the only product I see is "Autumn's Gold Granola Bar, Cinnamon Almond, 1.24 oz, 16-count" for $23.99. They look yummy! 

- Thu Feb 02, 2023 3:34 pm
- Forum: Bonds
- Topic: When is it time to load up on bonds.
- Replies: 40
- Views: 56274
Re: When is it time to load up on bonds.
One guys' commentary I do still read is Hussman. The article linked below is the latest. A couple quotes stood out: I feel kind of bad for Hussman. Yes, I used to read him too, but as far as I can see he's never really recovered from the beating he took after the Global Financial Crisis (when he di...
- Thu Jan 19, 2023 8:22 am
- Forum: Permanent Portfolio Discussion
- Topic: 25 x 4 or 33 x 3
- Replies: 37
- Views: 83591
Re: 25 x 4 or 33 x 3
Our very own Tyler wrote an excellent essay about the importance of cash in your portfolio:
https://portfoliocharts.com/2017/05/12/ ... -investor/
https://portfoliocharts.com/2017/05/12/ ... -investor/
- Tue Jan 03, 2023 5:38 pm
- Forum: Stocks
- Topic: SCV in the GB
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8723
Re: SCV in the GB
Thanks to you both, this information is extremely helpful!foglifter wrote: ↑Tue Jan 03, 2023 4:27 pm+1 on SLYV and IJS. I also use AVUV, which seems to be gaining interest (AUM reached 4.8B) and sports a fairly low ER of 0.25%.flyingpylon wrote: ↑Tue Jan 03, 2023 1:08 pm Some additional options are SLYV and IJS. They are both "S&P 600 Small Cap Value" ETFs.